Here is a picture of what we're supposed to do for phase four. The main idea is to: describe and critique.
Phase four requires all groups to come together and review their individual cases and pick a a case they can work with. From the case your group picks, pick ONE issue (example: succession) and use three THEORIES (lens on reality) that your group feels is related to the issue at hand. Does it make you see the case differently due to the given theories?
Any alternatives for actions based on the theory? There's no real solution (there never really is) but just many alternatives and possible suggestions). You can use SMART criteria for the alternatives.
How can you combine the divide between theory and reality?
Phase four requires all groups to come together and review their individual cases and pick a a case they can work with. From the case your group picks, pick ONE issue (example: succession) and use three THEORIES (lens on reality) that your group feels is related to the issue at hand. Does it make you see the case differently due to the given theories?
Any alternatives for actions based on the theory? There's no real solution (there never really is) but just many alternatives and possible suggestions). You can use SMART criteria for the alternatives.
How can you combine the divide between theory and reality?
No comments:
Post a Comment